... | ... | @@ -629,6 +629,138 @@ So far all examples only used ``Within``-subject factors, where each participant |
|
|
|
|
|
Notice that every participants either only sees ``1``s or ``2``s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Repetition defined per Phase
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following three examples all use the same factors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Color: {🟠, 🔵} (``Mixing Order: RandomOrder``)
|
|
|
* Number: {1, 2} (``Mixing Order: RandomOrder``)
|
|
|
* ``Number Of Repetitions: 2``
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
|
<details>
|
|
|
<summary>StudySetup.json</summary>
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"Phases": [
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"Name": "Study",
|
|
|
"Factors": [
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"FactorName": "Map",
|
|
|
"Levels": [
|
|
|
"/Game/Maps/StudyMap1"
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
"MixingOrder": "RandomOrder",
|
|
|
"Type": "Within",
|
|
|
"NonCombined": false,
|
|
|
"MapFactor": true
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"FactorName": "TextColor",
|
|
|
"Levels": [
|
|
|
"Orange",
|
|
|
"Blue"
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
"MixingOrder": "RandomOrder",
|
|
|
"Type": "Within",
|
|
|
"NonCombined": false
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"FactorName": "Number",
|
|
|
"Levels": [
|
|
|
"1",
|
|
|
"2"
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
"MixingOrder": "RandomOrder",
|
|
|
"Type": "Within",
|
|
|
"NonCombined": false
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
"Dependent Variables": [
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"Name": "Visibility",
|
|
|
"Required": true
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"Name": "OtherData",
|
|
|
"Required": false
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
"Number Of Repetitions": 2,
|
|
|
"TypeOfRepetition": "SameOrder"
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
"PhasesToOrderRandomize": [],
|
|
|
"FadeConfig":
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"StartFadedOut": true,
|
|
|
"FadeDuration": 2,
|
|
|
"FadeOutDuration": 1,
|
|
|
"FadeColor": "(R=0.000000,G=0.000000,B=0.000000,A=1.000000)"
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
"ExperimenterViewConfig":
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"ShowHUD": true,
|
|
|
"ShowConditionsPanelByDefault": false,
|
|
|
"ShowExperimenterViewInSecondWindow": false,
|
|
|
"SecondWindowSizeX": 1920,
|
|
|
"SecondWindowSizeY": 1080,
|
|
|
"SecondWindowPosX": 1920,
|
|
|
"SecondWindowPosY": 0
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
"UseGazeTracker": "NotTracking"
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
</details>
|
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
## ``Type of Repetition: SameOrder``
|
|
|
|
|
|
| participant # | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
|
| 0 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 1 |
|
|
|
| 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 2 |
|
|
|
| 2 | 🔵 1 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 2 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 1 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 2 | 🟠 1 |
|
|
|
| 3 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 2 |
|
|
|
| 4 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 1 |
|
|
|
| ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The second four conditions are exactly in the same order as the first four.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## ``Type of Repetition: SameOrder``
|
|
|
|
|
|
| participant # | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
|
| 0 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 2 |
|
|
|
| 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 1 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 2 | 🟠 1 |
|
|
|
| 2 | 🔵 1 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 2 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 2 |
|
|
|
| 3 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 2 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 1 |
|
|
|
| 4 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 2 |
|
|
|
| ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that all conditions are seen exactly once before they are repeated a second time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## ``Type of Repetition: Fully Random``
|
|
|
|
|
|
| participant # | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
|
| 0 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 1 | 🔵 1 |
|
|
|
| 1 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 2 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 1 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 1 |
|
|
|
| 2 | 🟠 2 | 🟠 2 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 1 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 2 |
|
|
|
| 3 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 2 |
|
|
|
| 4 | 🔵 1 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 1 |
|
|
|
| 5 | 🔵 1 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 1 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 2 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 2 | 🟠 1 |
|
|
|
| 6 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 1 | 🟠 2 | 🟠 2 |
|
|
|
| 7 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 2 | 🟠 1 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 2 | 🔵 1 | 🟠 2 |
|
|
|
| 8 ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that this requires not a multiple of 4 but of 8 participants to be perfectly counterbalanced. Also when randomizig it it not considered that 🟠 1 = 🟠 1 they are treated as two separate conditions in the Latin Square, which can yield some patterns reoccuring more often then others. However, it is hard to tell what a better solution would be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
... | ... | |