Assignment of outer areas working correctly?
Created by: marcusfuchs
First of all sorry for raising a few doubts here and in #561 (closed) ! Unfortunately, my knowledge of TEASER is not enough to clarify this myself, so I wanted to ask for verification on the assignment of outer areas.
To understand the assignment of outer areas, I created two buildings:
bldg = prj.add_non_residential(
method="bmvbs",
usage="office",
name=f"ReferenceOL1",
year_of_construction=year,
number_of_floors=2,
height_of_floors=3.5,
net_leased_area=1000.0,
window_layout=2,
office_layout=1,
)
bldg = prj.add_non_residential(
method="bmvbs",
usage="office",
name=f"ReferenceOL3",
year_of_construction=year,
number_of_floors=2,
height_of_floors=3.5,
net_leased_area=1000.0,
window_layout=2,
office_layout=3,
)
The building ReferenceOL1
sets office_layout = 1
, which is documented as an elongated floor. In contrast, the building ReferenceOL3
has office_layout = 3
, which should represent a square building footprint.
From the following code in the office archetype, I would conclude that the length
of a building defines the lengths of its southern and northern walls, while the width
represents the lengths of its eastern and western walls.
for key, value in self.outer_wall_names.items():
# North and South
if value[1] == 0 or value[1] == 180:
self.outer_area[value[1]] = self._est_outer_wall_area * \
(self._est_length / (
2 * self._est_width + 2 *
self._est_length))
# East and West
elif value[1] == 90 or value[1] == 270:
self.outer_area[value[1]] = self._est_outer_wall_area * \
(self._est_width / (
2 * self._est_width + 2 *
self._est_length))
When I look into the values, I think these assumptions are confirmed:
-
ReferenceOL1
:- width: 13 m
- lengths: 44 m
-
ReferenceOL3
:- width: 24 m
- lengths: 24 m
Also, for the elongated building ReferenceOL1
, in the values that get assigned to self.outer_area[value[1]]
, I see larger area values for the if-clauses' "north-south" part (112) than in the else-branch documented as "east-west" (33).
From this I would conclude, that the building ReferenceOL1
with larger length
compared to width
has more windows exposed to the south side than the square building ReferenceOL3
. Therefore, I would expect larger cooling loads in ReferenceOL1
. Yet, when simulating both buildings, I get the following values:
Heat demand of ReferenceOL1.mat: 26.723889711387972 MWh
Cooling demand of ReferenceOL1.mat: 28.262188 MWh
Heat demand of ReferenceOL3.mat: 30.329624587889192 MWh
Cooling demand of ReferenceOL3.mat: 29.831456 MWh
Thanks in advance for any help in figuring out whether the problem is in my understanding of the code or the code itself!