diff --git a/acknowledgments.tex b/acknowledgments.tex
index 6cac8a37d8f55ca635e32073deced201df0ae770..b75ed0c2e4351e55142eaa5ee5577121af1d091b 100644
--- a/acknowledgments.tex
+++ b/acknowledgments.tex
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ For help regarding AFM results and Chamber operation (Leak-testing) I would also
For help with SEM measurement and other support, I want to thank Kanji Furuta and Thorben Frahm for the additional EDX measurement and clarifications regarding SEM measurements.
-For the nice group atmosphere and interesting discussions I would like to thank the whole work group Jeff Strasdas, Benjamin Pestka, Michiel Reul, Tim Jacobs, Dishi Gingwar, Niklas Leuth, Marcus Eßer, Reza Habibipour.
+For the nice group atmosphere and interesting discussions I would like to thank the whole work group Jeff Strasdas, Benjamin Pestka, Michiel Reul, Tim Jacobs, Dishi Gangwar, Niklas Leuth, Marcus Eßer, Reza Habibipour.
For the quick work and pleasant atmosphere during the creation and repair of parts, I want to thank the entire crew of the workshop
diff --git a/chap05.aux b/chap05.aux
index 9b657b2f5935fb10539ca9d63b100c162c5cb0ec..c070212e47e0c576332f633c6b207a64353d5cd8 100644
--- a/chap05.aux
+++ b/chap05.aux
@@ -88,8 +88,8 @@
\newlabel{sub@fig:evaporation_simulation_rejection_comparison}{{c}{85}{\relax }{figure.caption.86}{}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5.14}{\ignorespaces Simulated evaporation dots without (\subref {fig:evaporation_simulation_rejection_prev}) and with (\subref {fig:evaporation_simulation_rejection_after}) $90$ \% probability to reject a deposition, when no previous deposition happened on the target pixel. (\subref {fig:evaporation_simulation_rejection_comparison}) shows the AFM image parameters for simulation were obtained from for comparison. The parameters of the ellipse are the same as in Figure \ref {fig:evaporation_simulation_first_compare}.}}{85}{figure.caption.86}\protected@file@percent }
\newlabel{fig:evaporation_simulation_rejection}{{5.14}{85}{Simulated evaporation dots without (\subref {fig:evaporation_simulation_rejection_prev}) and with (\subref {fig:evaporation_simulation_rejection_after}) $90$ \% probability to reject a deposition, when no previous deposition happened on the target pixel. (\subref {fig:evaporation_simulation_rejection_comparison}) shows the AFM image parameters for simulation were obtained from for comparison. The parameters of the ellipse are the same as in Figure \ref {fig:evaporation_simulation_first_compare}}{figure.caption.86}{}}
-\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5.15}{\ignorespaces Image of final simulation with parameters given in Figure \ref {fig:evaporation_simulation_first_compare} and an anharmonic oscillation with a power of $20$.}}{86}{figure.caption.87}\protected@file@percent }
-\newlabel{fig:evaporation_simulation_progression}{{5.15}{86}{Image of final simulation with parameters given in Figure \ref {fig:evaporation_simulation_first_compare} and an anharmonic oscillation with a power of $20$}{figure.caption.87}{}}
+\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5.15}{\ignorespaces Image of final simulation with parameters given in Figure \ref {fig:evaporation_simulation_first_compare} and an anharmonic oscillation with a power of $20$. The image is very grainy due to a low amount of rays cast.}}{86}{figure.caption.87}\protected@file@percent }
+\newlabel{fig:evaporation_simulation_progression}{{5.15}{86}{Image of final simulation with parameters given in Figure \ref {fig:evaporation_simulation_first_compare} and an anharmonic oscillation with a power of $20$. The image is very grainy due to a low amount of rays cast}{figure.caption.87}{}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Software improvements}{86}{section*.88}\protected@file@percent }
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{Conclusion}{87}{section*.89}\protected@file@percent }
\@setckpt{chap05}{
diff --git a/chap05.tex b/chap05.tex
index 58e50da93070eee8139629cdea0da2e72e59d6d9..25102a7791b0d3931cbd7f0806e45577e50e3a62 100644
--- a/chap05.tex
+++ b/chap05.tex
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ The mask being deformed by nearly $45^\circ$ at a single hole site locally would
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\linewidth]{img/Evaporation/Sim/OverlapCircles.pdf}
+ \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{img/Evaporation/Sim/OverlapCircles.pdf}
\caption{Simulation showing the effect of only x-y vibration on the resulting evaporation. White circles show the extreme positions of the circular mask. }
\label{fig:evaporation_simulation_overlap}
\end{figure}
@@ -309,18 +309,18 @@ The different roughness from circle and ellipse might suggest different possible
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
- \begin{subfigure}{0.32\linewidth}
- \includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple.pdf}
+ \begin{subfigure}{0.325\linewidth}
+ \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple.pdf}
\caption{}
\label{fig:evaporation_simulation_sharpness_stick_simple}
\end{subfigure}
- \begin{subfigure}{0.32\linewidth}
- \includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_initial.pdf}
+ \begin{subfigure}{0.325\linewidth}
+ \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_initial.pdf}
\caption{}
\label{fig:evaporation_simulation_sharpness_stick_initial}
\end{subfigure}
- \begin{subfigure}{0.32\linewidth}
- \includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_power.pdf}
+ \begin{subfigure}{0.325\linewidth}
+ \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_power.pdf}
\caption{}
\label{fig:evaporation_simulation_sharpness_stick_power}
\end{subfigure}
@@ -336,12 +336,12 @@ Lead or in general any deposited material deposits more easily, when there is al
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
- \begin{subfigure}{0.32\linewidth}
+ \begin{subfigure}{0.325\linewidth}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_power.pdf}
\caption{}
\label{fig:evaporation_simulation_rejection_prev}
\end{subfigure}
- \begin{subfigure}{0.32\linewidth}
+ \begin{subfigure}{0.325\linewidth}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_rejection.pdf}
\caption{}
\label{fig:evaporation_simulation_rejection_after}
@@ -357,12 +357,12 @@ Lead or in general any deposited material deposits more easily, when there is al
The results of adding this penalty for initial deposition are shown in Figure \ref{fig:evaporation_simulation_rejection_after}. As compared to the previous simulation step in Figure \ref{fig:evaporation_simulation_rejection_prev} the dot appears more rough and the height has decreases. The outer tail of the ellipse disappears nearly completely, these parameters match the deposition in the actual AFM image more closely, but crucially the decreased roughness of the elliptical part of the dot is not mirrored in the simulation, where the dot also appears rough. Typically, growth prefers to occur at grains, since these function as nucleation sites. Particles impinging on the surface will diffuse to a nearby large nucleation site. The simulation does not take this effect into account at all. Though it could be implemented, by having each pixel interact with neighboring pixels. \\
-The simulation image matches the one given by the AFM measurement pretty well, which shows that vibrations bending the holey part of the mask induced by the vibrations of the turbomolecular pump are a plausible explanation for the abberant penumbra of the measured dots.
+The simulation image matches the one given by the AFM measurement pretty well, which shows that vibrations bending the hole pattern of the mask induced by the vibrations of the turbomolecular pump are a plausible explanation for the abberant penumbra of the measured dots. Particularly it shows that a mixture of deformation on the mask edge and lateral vibrations can cause the artifacts seen in the AFM images.
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_progression.pdf}
- \caption{Image of final simulation with parameters given in Figure \ref{fig:evaporation_simulation_first_compare} and an anharmonic oscillation with a power of $20$.}
+ \caption{Image of final simulation with parameters given in Figure \ref{fig:evaporation_simulation_first_compare} and an anharmonic oscillation with a power of $20$. The image is very grainy due to a low amount of rays cast.}
\label{fig:evaporation_simulation_progression}
\end{figure}
diff --git a/img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_progression.pdf b/img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_progression.pdf
index e92ce46d47323d01a543bb8a9e41206d881a76cb..54beaca432fac4be73310f41fe1bb7e0f1e6d63d 100644
Binary files a/img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_progression.pdf and b/img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_progression.pdf differ
diff --git a/pdfa.xmpi b/pdfa.xmpi
index 74bdd44732072e201c54bd96bd5fd4775ea8c91c..7527230bb7bdfaf61de69a120960823ca1503e90 100644
--- a/pdfa.xmpi
+++ b/pdfa.xmpi
@@ -73,15 +73,15 @@
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="" xmlns:xmp="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/">
<xmp:CreatorTool>LaTeX with hyperref</xmp:CreatorTool>
- <xmp:ModifyDate>2024-08-28T16:26:19+02:00</xmp:ModifyDate>
- <xmp:CreateDate>2024-08-28T16:26:19+02:00</xmp:CreateDate>
- <xmp:MetadataDate>2024-08-28T16:26:19+02:00</xmp:MetadataDate>
+ <xmp:ModifyDate>2024-08-28T17:57:22+02:00</xmp:ModifyDate>
+ <xmp:CreateDate>2024-08-28T17:57:22+02:00</xmp:CreateDate>
+ <xmp:MetadataDate>2024-08-28T17:57:22+02:00</xmp:MetadataDate>
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="" xmlns:xmpRights = "http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/rights/">
</rdf:Description>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="" xmlns:xmpMM="http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/mm/">
<xmpMM:DocumentID>uuid:C8CFC28F-88E1-7995-E9AD-F6D12EAD346B</xmpMM:DocumentID>
- <xmpMM:InstanceID>uuid:471B6B2A-4F38-D86B-875B-AB1785D76ABA</xmpMM:InstanceID>
+ <xmpMM:InstanceID>uuid:1895DC9E-C592-434D-F8E7-2D1A56D3DE1A</xmpMM:InstanceID>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
</x:xmpmeta>
diff --git a/thesis.log b/thesis.log
index 19149a5d3e5bf95ec6337e5abc949d7717b49bfa..5b0f49df1c5cb342e1b4d2e73a95b9a83e1954bb 100644
--- a/thesis.log
+++ b/thesis.log
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.24 (MiKTeX 22.7) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2024.7.28) 28 AUG 2024 16:26
+This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592653-2.6-1.40.24 (MiKTeX 22.7) (preloaded format=pdflatex 2024.7.28) 28 AUG 2024 17:57
entering extended mode
restricted \write18 enabled.
%&-line parsing enabled.
@@ -2812,7 +2812,7 @@ File: img/Evaporation/Sim/OverlapCircles.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
<use img/Evaporation/Sim/OverlapCircles.pdf>
Package pdftex.def Info: img/Evaporation/Sim/OverlapCircles.pdf used on input
line 301.
-(pdftex.def) Requested size: 207.32315pt x 159.34598pt.
+(pdftex.def) Requested size: 230.36061pt x 177.05394pt.
[82 <./img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right.pdf> <./img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_righ
@@ -2830,7 +2830,7 @@ File: img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple.pdf Graphic file (type pdf)
<use img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple.pdf>
Package pdftex.def Info: img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple.pdf used
on input line 313.
-(pdftex.def) Requested size: 140.062pt x 107.82686pt.
+(pdftex.def) Requested size: 149.73299pt x 115.2697pt.
<img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_initial.pdf, id=3668, 364.9783pt x
280.97652pt>
File: img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_initial.pdf Graphic file (typ
@@ -2838,7 +2838,7 @@ e pdf)
<use img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_initial.pdf>
Package pdftex.def Info: img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_initial.pd
f used on input line 318.
-(pdftex.def) Requested size: 140.062pt x 107.82686pt.
+(pdftex.def) Requested size: 149.73299pt x 115.2697pt.
<img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_power.pdf, id=3669, 364.9783pt x 2
80.97652pt>
File: img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_power.pdf Graphic file (type
@@ -2846,7 +2846,7 @@ pdf)
<use img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_power.pdf>
Package pdftex.def Info: img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_power.pdf
used on input line 323.
-(pdftex.def) Requested size: 140.062pt x 107.82686pt.
+(pdftex.def) Requested size: 149.73299pt x 115.2697pt.
[83 <./img/Evaporation/Sim/OverlapCircles.pdf>]
@@ -2864,7 +2864,7 @@ pdf)
<use img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_power.pdf>
Package pdftex.def Info: img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_power.pdf
used on input line 340.
-(pdftex.def) Requested size: 147.43416pt x 113.50331pt.
+(pdftex.def) Requested size: 149.73299pt x 115.2697pt.
<img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_rejection.pdf, id=3703, 364.9783pt
x 280.97652pt>
File: img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_rejection.pdf Graphic file (t
@@ -2872,7 +2872,7 @@ ype pdf)
<use img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_rejection.pdf>
Package pdftex.def Info: img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_rejection.
pdf used on input line 345.
-(pdftex.def) Requested size: 147.43416pt x 113.50331pt.
+(pdftex.def) Requested size: 149.73299pt x 115.2697pt.
<img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right.png, id=3704, 1231.60126pt x 1083.04625pt>
File: img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right.png Graphic file (type png)
<use img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right.png>
@@ -2887,14 +2887,14 @@ Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) in paragraph at lines 358--359
[]
-<img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_progression.pdf, id=3785, 428.18591pt x 2
-69.66383pt>
+<img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_progression.pdf, id=3785, 713.0829pt x 42
+0.69434pt>
File: img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_progression.pdf Graphic file (type p
df)
<use img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_progression.pdf>
Package pdftex.def Info: img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_progression.pdf
used on input line 364.
-(pdftex.def) Requested size: 414.6463pt x 261.15388pt.
+(pdftex.def) Requested size: 414.6463pt x 244.63196pt.
[85 <./img/Evaporation/Sim/Field3_right_sim_simple_rejection.pdf> <./img/Evapor
@@ -3256,10 +3256,10 @@ Package rerunfilecheck Info: File `thesis.out' has not changed.
(rerunfilecheck) Checksum: E7BB78466ADE486C5C8B624002B9367D;9501.
)
Here is how much of TeX's memory you used:
- 32072 strings out of 473902
- 608138 string characters out of 5726580
+ 32054 strings out of 473902
+ 607761 string characters out of 5726580
1941908 words of memory out of 5000000
- 53954 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+600000
+ 53936 multiletter control sequences out of 15000+600000
637991 words of font info for 97 fonts, out of 8000000 for 9000
1141 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191
99i,19n,101p,1541b,2323s stack positions out of 10000i,1000n,20000p,200000b,200000s
@@ -3282,7 +3282,7 @@ f/AppData/Local/Programs/MiKTeX/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmri12.pfb><C:/Users/Luzi
f/AppData/Local/Programs/MiKTeX/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmri8.pfb><C:/Users/Luzif
/AppData/Local/Programs/MiKTeX/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmsy10.pfb><C:/Users/Luzif
/AppData/Local/Programs/MiKTeX/fonts/type1/public/lm/lmsy8.pfb>
-Output written on thesis.pdf (103 pages, 262431337 bytes).
+Output written on thesis.pdf (103 pages, 262461239 bytes).
PDF statistics:
4223 PDF objects out of 4296 (max. 8388607)
335 named destinations out of 1000 (max. 500000)
diff --git a/thesis.pdf b/thesis.pdf
index ea7c0469e62babda5f1e114d8c217bb47ee73bc1..6845a9cdecabb4e6c6b0258b281551dc93a65b00 100644
Binary files a/thesis.pdf and b/thesis.pdf differ
diff --git a/thesis.synctex.gz b/thesis.synctex.gz
index 78116ef8cfa2c1cb39f538b78bcd08f152431394..836934fc8b8551a85ac90f5205290d2bc07b8d6f 100644
Binary files a/thesis.synctex.gz and b/thesis.synctex.gz differ